第二章:希望傳播學院畢業的都是人,沒有畜牲!
思想和語文的科學化、邏輯化與創造力
註腳
【1】 Masato
Kajimoto, edX Course:
Making Sense of News, Journalism and Media Studies Center, University of Hong Kong, 2015.
【2】 Fred
Brown, Take Responsibility for the Accuracy of Their Work. Verify Information Before Releasing It. Use Original Sources Whenever Possible, Ethics Committee, Society of
Professional Journalists, http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/ethicscode/?
p=161 (last visited February 1, 2016) (“People have different ideas about
the truth of almost everything, including the age of the Earth – but accuracy
is less debatable.”).
【3】 Society
of Professional Journalists, SPJ Code of
Ethics, (September 6, 2014 at 4:49 p.m. revised), http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
(last visited February 1, 2016) (“Take responsibility for the accuracy of their
work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original Sources whenever possible.”).
【4】 Los
Angeles Police Department News Release, Detectives Looking for Missing Canadian Woman
Young Woman’s Disappearance from Downtown Hotel is Suspicious, Official
Site of The Los Angeles Police Department, February 6, 2013, http://www.lapdonline.org/february_2013/news_view/52943
(last visited May 04, 2016).
【5】 CBS
News, Elisa Lam Case: Autopsy Fails to
Find a Cause of Death for Woman Found in Los Angeles Water Tank, February
22, 2013, 1:59 PM, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/elisa-lam-case-autopsy-fails-to-find-a-cause-of-death-for-woman-found-in-los-angeles-water-tank/ (last visited
May 04, 2016).
【6】 國際中心/綜合報導,迷離刼 藍可兒命案五大疑團待解!ETtoday東森新聞雲,2013年3月6日,http://www.ettoday.net/news/20130306/170604.htm(最後瀏覽日:2016 年 2 月 19 日)。
【7】 CBS
and Associated Press, Mail Online: Body
of Missing Tourist Found in Hotel Water Tank After Vanishing for Nearly Three
Weeks May Have Been Accidental, 21 February 2013 updated, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281485/Elisa-Lam-Canadian-student-believed-floating-dead-water-tank-Cecil-Hotel-Los-Angeles.html (last visited
May 04, 2016).
【8】 Alan
Duke, How Did Woman’s Body Come to be in
L.A. Hotel Water Tank? CNN, February 23, 2013,
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/02/21/us/california-hotel-water-corpse/ (last
visited May 04, 2016).
【9】 綜合報導,蛇蠍女獨謀殺人 雙屍案與檢警鬥法,蘋果日報,2013年3月30日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130330/34920135/(最後瀏覽日:2016 年 5 月 4 日)。
【10】社會中心,謝依涵下迷藥 老夫婦魂斷紅樹林,自由時報,2013年3月31日,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/666507(最後瀏覽日:2016 年 2 月 19 日)。
【12】Arron Barlow, The Citizen Journalist as Gatekeeper: A Critical
Evolution from the Public Journalism Movement, in Public Journalism 2.0: The Promise and Reality of a
Citizen-Engaged Press 45 (Jack
Rosenberry & Burton St John III.) (NY eds. 2009); Luigi Manca, Journalists: Gatekeepers or Gate-openers? A
Reinterpretation of the Westley-MacLean Model Based on MacLean's Unpublished
Papers, September 15, 1999, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~pieper/manca-paper.html (last visited June 06, 2016).
【13】Id. (“Journalists
act as gatekeepers in the mass communication process and, because of their
privileged role, they ought to report the news objectively and check their own
political convictions at the door as they enter the newsroom. They ought to be
impartial referees as competing advocates of this or that cause struggle to
promote their particular interpretations or spins to the public.”).
【14】Deborah Potter,獨立新聞工作手冊-什麼是新聞,美國國務院國際資訊局,http://www.ait.org.tw/infousa/zhtw/PUBS/Handbook_Journalism/whatis.htm(最後瀏覽日:2016 年5月4日)。
【15】同上。
【16】Eric Etheridge, Rick Santelli: Tea Party Time, The New York Times, Feb. 20, 2009, http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/rick-santelli-tea-party-time/
(last visited May 04, 2016).
【17】David Folkenlick, NPR Ends
Williams’ Contract
After
Muslim Remarks,
National Public Radio, Oct. 21, 2010, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130712737
(last visited May 04, 2016)
【18】林元輝,新聞公害的批判基礎—以涂醒哲舔耳冤案新聞為主例,巨流圖書,2006年,頁78。
【19】王毓莉、賴祥蔚,廣電暨新興媒體寫作的理論與實務,五南圖書,2006年,頁75-76。
【20】即時新聞/綜合報導,林元輝:希望傳播學院畢業的沒有畜生,自由時報,2014年8月27日,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1091747(最後瀏覽日:2016 年 2 月 19 日)。
【21】胡適,介紹我自己的思想,1930年。
【22】同上。
【23】胡適,杜威論思想,1919年。
【24】胡適,新思潮的意義,1919年。
【25】周質平,評胡適的提倡科學與整理國故,摘自胡適與近代中國,頁172, http://www.yucc.org.tw/publications/books/justice/AA0030/aa0030100.pdf/view(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月4日)。
【26】胡適,註24。
【27】胡適,《紅樓夢》考證,1921年。
【28】胡明,胡適批判的反思,1991年10月,https://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ics/21c/issue/articles/008_91260.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月4日)。
【29】雷頤,中國知識分子的百年孤寂,一起讀書吧第582期;摘自雷頤,孤寂百年:中國現代知識分子十二論,廣西師範大學出版社理想國;周質平,註25。
【30】黃崇憲,「現代性」的多義性與多重向度,東海大學社會系,http://www.csat.org.tw/paper/E3-1_%E9%BB%83%E5%B4%87%E6%86%B2_%E5%85%A8%E6%96%87.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月4日)。
【31】同上。
沒有留言:
張貼留言