第十章:說一套、做另一套的表裡不一
從教化到思辨
註腳
【1】 Judging
Amy, Trial by Jury,
Season 1, Episode 3, September 28, 1999.
【2】 Meredith
Doig, Reason vs Emotion: Key
Drivers
in the History
of Moral
Progress,
http://www.hsnsw.asn.au/articles/ReasonVsEmotion-MDoig.pdf (last visited May
07, 2016) (“Plato saw Reason and Emotion as two horses pulling a chariot in
different directions, while the charioteer struggles to get them to work as a
team. He proposed that the human soul comprises three parts: Reason, the
Appetites and the Will. Only when the Appetites and the Will are working under
the control of Reason can the soul be fully human. Both Plato and Aristotle saw
Reason as inherently superior to the Emotions, with Aristotle arguing that
human happiness depends on the
exercise of Reason. This idea of the superiority of Reason influenced
philosophers for centuries. Reason was what distinguished humans from the
animals and the emotions simply got in the way of its proper exercise.”).
【3】 Jay
Heinrichs, How to Teach a Child to Argue, Wonderime, 2007,
http://inpraiseofargument.squarespace.com/teach-a-kid-to-argue/ (last visited
May 07, 2016).
【4】 Id.
【5】 Sarah
Kliff, Meet Sandra Kliff: The Woman You Didn’t Hear at Congress’ Contraceptives Hearing,
The Washington Post, February 16, 2012, https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/meet-sandra-fluke-the-woman-you-didnt-hear-at-congress-contraceptives-hearing/2012/02/16/gIQAJh57HR_blog.html (last visited May 07, 2016).
【6】 Molly
Morehead, In Context: Sandra Fluke on Contraceptives and Women’s Health,
PolitiFact, March 06, 2012, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/mar/06/context-sandra-fluke-contraceptives-and-womens-hea/
(last visited May 07, 2016) ; also
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRC0nsjtKQ (last visited May 07,
2016).
【7】 Anne-Marie
Slaughter, On Thinking
Like
a Lawyer,
May 2002, https://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Commentary/On%20Thinking%20Like%20a%20Lawyer.pdf
(last visited May 07, 2016) (Arguments may be bad because they are illogical,
because they do not fit the facts or the law, because they are silly or
inconsequential.”).
【8】 批教育部長蔣偉寧偽善!清大陳為廷公布影音與發言全文,ETtoday東森新聞雲,2012年12月4日,http://www.ettoday.net/news/20121204/135256.htm(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日);影音檔,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnaNftH8X18(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【9】 費孝通,鄉土中國,頁31,1947年。
【10】同上,頁34。
【11】同上。
【12】The Week
Staff, Rush Limbaugh v. Sandra Fluke: A Timeline,
The Week, March 06, 2012, http://theweek.com/articles/477570/rush-limbaugh-vs-sandra-fluke-timeline
(last visited June 08, 2016).
【13】David Frum, Are We Being Fair to Rush Limbaugh?
CNN, March 06, 2012, http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/05/opinion/frum-rush-limbaugh-fairness/
(last visited May 07, 2016).
【14】司法院大法官會議釋字第509號大法官吳庚協同意見書,http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/uploadfile/C100/509.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月4日)。
【15】費孝通,註9。
【16】同上,頁35。
【17】同上,頁49。
【18】同上,頁38-40。
【19】馮光遠,除了吳育昇,金溥聰也是我的!(是的,我很貪心),自由時報,2015年9月21日,http://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/917250(最後瀏覽日:2016年6月8日)。
【20】馮光遠,不騙大家,只有金溥聰夠資格稱馬英九為「馬子」,2013年2月20日,http://whiteeyeishere.blogspot.tw/2013/02/blog-post_20.html(最後瀏覽日:2016年6月8日)。
【21】台灣高等法院103年度上易字第2515號刑事判決。
【22】政治中心,影射搞同性戀 金溥聰越洋告馮光遠,蘋果日報,2013年11月11日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20131111/290593/(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【24】馮光遠,法院認證「男妓」之真相,自由時報自由評論網,2015年3月23日,http://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/865301(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【25】司法院,註14。
【26】Hustler
Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (U.S. 1988).
【27】Id. at 57.
【28】Id. at
56-57 (“The jury found against respondent on his
libel claim when it decided that the Hustler ad parody could not ‘reasonably be
understood as describing actual facts about [respondent] or actual events in
which [he] participated.’”).
【29】 Id. at 57, White J. Dissenting (“As I see it, the decision in New York Times Co. v.
Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254 (1964), has little to do with this case, for
here the jury found that the ad contained no assertion of fact.”).
【30】Id., at 56-57 (“We conclude that public figures
and public officials may not recover for the tort of intentional infliction of
emotional distress by reason of publications such as the one here at issue
without showing, in addition, that the publication contains a false statement
of fact which was made with "actual malice," i.e., with
knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard as to whether
or not it was true. This is not merely a "blind application" of
the New York Times standard, it reflects our considered
judgment that such a standard is necessary to give adequate "breathing
space" to the freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Here it is clear that
respondent Falwell is a "public figure" for purposes of First
Amendment law. The jury
found against respondent on his libel claim when it decided that the Hustler ad
parody could not ‘reasonably
be understood as describing actual facts about [respondent] or actual events in
which [he] participated.’ App. to Pet. for Cert. C1. The Court of Appeals interpreted the jury’s finding to be that the
ad parody "was not reasonably believable,’ and, in accordance with our
custom, we accept this finding. Respondent is thus relegated to his claim for
damages awarded by the jury for the intentional infliction of emotional
distress by ‘outrageous’ conduct. But, for
reasons heretofore stated, this claim cannot, consistently with the First
Amendment, form a basis for the award of damages when the conduct in question
is the publication of a caricature such as the ad parody involved here. The
judgment of the Court of Appeals is accordingly Reversed.”).
【31】蕭婷芳,「男妓」說得罪性工作者和同志?馮光遠再諷金溥聰,自由時報,2015年7月28日,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/1393523(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【32】Ralph Jennings, Taiwan’s Year of Deadly
Disasters: The Real Damon, Forbes, July 02, 2015, available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2015/07/01/taiwans-year-of-deadly-disasters-the-real-demon/
(last visited May 07, 2016).
【33】黃揚明,林柯配 何宗勳:林義雄、柯文哲搭檔選2016總統,蘋果日報,2015年月11日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150111/540025/(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【34】政治中心,訓分局長 「法輪功被揍就換掉你」,蘋果日報,2014年12月26日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20141226/36290094/(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【35】綜合報導,柯文哲再開罵 趙藤雄心被狗啃了,蘋果日報,2015年1月23日,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuNcnrZaaYg(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【36】政治中心綜合報導,蔡英文接任黨主席挨轟 柯文哲:別每次都先看衰,三立新聞網,2016年3月3日,http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=127636(最後瀏覽日:2016年4月4日)。
【37】陳思豪,吳思華告學生 柯文哲:反正他也是打手阿,蘋果日報,2015年7月25日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150725/655218/(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【38】綜合報導,要求吳思華出面!柯文哲:要當打手就該勇敢,自由時報,2015年7月31日,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1396370(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【39】陳思豪,張景森:柯P對戴季全感情用事 最後傷了自己,蘋果日報,2015年9月17日,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150917/693617/(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
【40】劉宛琳,美河市判決 柯P:有兩個小官很賤,聯合新聞網,2015年12月28日,http://udn.com/news/story/2/1405661-%E7%BE%8E%E6%B2%B3%E5%B8%82%E6%A1%88%E5%88%A4%E6%B1%BA-%E6%9F%AFP%EF%BC%9A%E6%9C%89%E5%85%A9%E5%80%8B%E5%B0%8F%E5%AE%98%E5%BE%88%E8%B3%A4(最後瀏覽日:2016年6月8日)。
【41】台灣桃園地方法院刑事判決102年度軍重訴字第3號。
【42】威克,台灣《軍事審判法》修正案引發的爭議,BBC中文網,2013年8月6日,http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2013/08/130806_taiwan_military_law(最後瀏覽日:2016年5月7日)。
作者已經移除這則留言。
回覆刪除田老師您好,敝姓邱,名紹群,台大法律2017年的畢業生,現於花蓮地檢署服替代役。最近在拜讀您的書,受益良多。
回覆刪除在此冒昧想指出一件小事:本章(第十章)的題目,應該是《陳為廷在立法院的發言》,特此通知。
為我的冒昧打擾再次抱歉,我先回去讀《第三部分:法律制度》了。